Second amendment in Interim Constitution in the offing

[divesh]

Second amendment in Interim Constitution in the offing

The government has decided to go for second amendment in the Interim Constitution, incorporating some new provisions that will pave way for setting the date for constituent assembly election as well as remove the King by two-thirds majority of the Interim Legislative Parliament if he is found ‘conspiring’ to disrupt the election.

http://www.nepalnews.com.np/archive/2007/apr/apr10/news14.php

[aniruddha]

these SPAM thugs know that they will not win Nepali ppl support regarding Monarchy thats why they want do whatever they like during interim constitution. Dont try to spoil Nepal like Iraq,Iran,Afganistan,Combodia and Libya.Otherwise every leader willbe killed one by one by any means of strike.

[hardtalk]

Constitutional Liberalism
(Courtesy: Siddhartha Thapa)

The peace process so far has been built on wishful thinking, hope and trust. The induction of Maoists into the interim government is also no exception – they were inducted purely with the hope and trust built over the last year with the SPA.

However, by inducting the Maoist into the government without the completion of credible arms management and a total renunciation of violence, the government has embarked on a high risk gamble. Unfortunately, the most worrisome aspect is that Girija has played his last card by inducting the Maoists into government. Implicit in this action is the realization that all options to mainstream the Maoists have been exhausted – we can only now hope that the Maoists will "walk the talk." But what if the Maoist fail to relinquish the violence that has been the number element of their so-called "political" campaign?

Democracy is a process and elections a part of this process (not an end in itself). At present, 118 out of the 193 countries in the world have embraced a democratic setup (of some sort), encompassing 54.8 % of the world's population.

The real challenge however, remains the transition to sustainable constitutional liberalism. For instance Iran holds elections on regular intervals, but its constitution legalizes the muzzling of press freedom. Zimbabwe has elected Robert Mugabe who in return has eliminated political opponents. And Saddam Hussein held elections, and that in turn legitimized his audacious brutality. Even Gyanendra claimed his fifteen month rule as a democratic one. The question of course, is whether these are examples of democratic exercises of democratic elements used to forward undemocratic designs?

Examples of a democracy gone awry are aplenty; often the end result is a tyrannical (illiberal) democracy. Given the continuation of Maoist violence and the ideology it supports – a one party communist republic - what is the guarantee that elections to a Constituent Assembly will not result in an illiberal democracy?

The real challenge to Nepal's peace process is the institutionalization of an inclusive democracy through constitutional liberalism. There is truly no alternative to constitutional liberalism.

But like other countries that have undergone difficulties during their own transitional phases, Nepal too is faced with gargantuan challenges that are hindering the prospects of a permanent solution. The first of these challenges is extremism.

Over the years, Nepal has witnessed the most adverse political circumstances. Each is directly correlated to the lack of skilled, quality leadership. With the political leadership's failure to guarantee a functioning democratic platform, individuals collectively resorted to extremism to fulfil their aspirations. As a result, the notion of 'self-determination' gained prominence as a catalyst to muster individual rights.

Extremism, however; in any form, has no ethics. It is based upon completely destroying state infrastructure and cleansing all social associations. Plainly speaking, the focus of extremism is on rewriting history. For extremists, the end always justifies their means, regardless of the suffering, loss of life. Events, atrocities, body counts are all relegated to lifeless statistics, later to be showcased to "honour" the "scarifies" made for extremist visionaries to come to power.

Yet another challenge to Nepal's peace process is guaranteeing individualism that is the bedrock of constitutional liberalism. Individualism is a vital theme that contributed to the changing politics of Nepal. With the advent of the internet and the media boom, communication barriers have been broken, making people increasingly aware; and, as a result the expectations of the common people have soared.

Today, in this ever-increasingly transparent society, individual freedom is the hypothesis through which the future of Nepal will be charted. Where morality and ethics will be based on individual perception, essentially meaning that the 'goal' in life is the attainment of a sense of individualism, that distinguishes one human from the next.

On the political front, the another serious challenge (to Nepal's peace process) is that of containing the armed Maoist militia. The rebel militia which numbers anywhere between 10,000 – 25,000 possesses small arms.

The distinction between the PLA and the militia is critical. While the PLA has fought the security organs of the state, the militia has been responsible for staging kangaroo courts, patrolling villages, abducting, extorting and canvassing Maoist ideology through the country. If the government chooses to continue ignoring the importance of disarming the militia, the forthcoming Constituent Assembly election results will overwhelmingly tilt in the favour of the Maoists.

For the greater Nepali population to participate in the Constituent Assembly elections, it is essential that all legitimate voters are roped into the electoral process – not just those that favour a particular ideology or fear a particular group. Therefore it is extremely critical for the government and the Maoists to prioritize the issue of rehabilitating displaced people prior to the election of constituent assembly.

But the rehabilitation of displaced people may not be desirable to the Maoists. The majority of displaced people fled their homes due to pressure from the rebel militia. And during the early phase of the "people's war," the Maoist militia had specifically targeted members of opposition political parties. As most political opponents of the rebels fled in an exodus to Kathmandu and other safety nets, the void created by the abrupt exodus was filled by ardent rebel sympathizers and the militia in villages throughout rural Nepal - the returnees could upset the balance of Maoist hegemony throughout the countryside.

Given the volatile situation of the country, in is inevitable that the SPA-M leaders will mutually consent to postponing elections, leading to an era of 'eight party rule with unachievable bogeys (once more). Elections are an important facet of a functioning democracy but holding them does not guarantee democratic discourse.

Democracy can only work if it guarantees freedom and accommodates divergent views. If the elections to a constituent assembly do not progress in the direction of constitutional liberalism, the whole exercise will lead to yet another political collision. So instead of falling over each other, congratulating the ruling parties on the "progress" of the peace process, we would be doing ourselves an even larger favour by logically questioning (and working towards) what is more important - the sustenance of the peace process (for sure), but simultaneously, the envisioning of an achievable set of goals, associated timelines and ultimately, a process that yields not just "peace and democracy," but also authentic constitutional liberalism.

[Chintit Nepali]

      " MAAN  NA - MAAN  ME  TERE  MEHMAAN "  "  JAAN  NA  PAHECHAN  ME  TERE  JAAN "
 

   No idea and  knowledege anyone including the key position holders of the state about where and what direction we all are taking this nation and its people by having all these types of activities like " Kahi Nabhayako Jaatra Handigaun Ko ". What sort of funny childish game going on like amending the main law of land very often initiated before its came real implementation ? How could the country can be able to maintain its credibility and stability out of the never ending works of amending the constitution untill the full fledged one repalced the old ?
 What the real use of CA election if whole fundamentals issues which are direct related to  people's democrativ rights have been intervening by political partners currently ruling the country ?  Are the parties really been mandated by people to do in the manner and issues as they like ? The question of fundamental principle of democracy and sovereignty on people are in great threat and the brighter and stable democratic future of the nation has been in putting in comma,so under all these circumstances how could we really bring democracy and prosparity this the most jenuine concern issue of todays Nepal.
     It seems that no one are serious towards the holding of CA,that is why all those acts have been on the way.It's almost proved fact that all the parties who are in current power politics have no real faith on democratic rights of people, so they are somehow trying their best to avoid CA or referendom and just concentrating their mind and time to improve ones strategical gain for future so that one can easily play same dirty game even in the time to come and retain its capability to exploit the nation and people as long as it could be possible.Jay Nepal !
  
    

[hardtalk]

CA elections: The rush to farce?

BY MITHUN JUNG

-"An election can be enacted. Election for (the sake of) election can be conducted. But real elections cannot be held." Former Election Commissioner Birendra Prasad Mishra, Bimarsha, 9 March 2007. "There is an abnormal situation now and the elections (constituent assembly) will also be abnormal. Maybe there will be a shorter time for the (June 2007) election preparations, but the election will be held on time at any cost." Prime Minister Girija Koirala, Seven Party Alliance and Maoists (SPAM) coalition, (Kathmandu Post, March 15 2007).

Why is octogenarian Prime Minister Girija Koirala, insisting that elections will be held, by June 2007, come hell or high water, to a constituent assembly to create "New Nepal"? What is a "constituent assembly"? Put simply, it is an assembly that is able to make or change a constitution. What is the constitution of a country? Put simply, it is the body of fundamental principles (often supplemented by practices and precedents) that determine the composition and functions of the principal organs of central and local government in the state, and regulate the relationship between them and individual citizens and the state.It is serious business! The constitution is supposed to be "the supreme law of the land". The Constitution of the United States has lasted 220 years, with only 26 amendments. In Nepal there have been six constitutions in sixty years. India has had one only in that time!

Nepal has never ever had a constituent assembly (CA) as such, and it seems that we have a tendency to churn out constitutions faster than some writers produce good fiction. Why this rush to have constituent assembly elections in hardly three months time? The process of explaining to the "people" what this phenomenon is has not even begun, in a country with forbidding problems of poverty, literacy, and communications. Advocates of rushing through constituent assembly elections have not even begun to address, and explain, the "K5H5" aspects to the people: "Ke Ho? Kina Ho? Kasari Ho? Kaile Ho? Ko Ho?" What, Why, How, When, and even Who. Some rural folk even think "it" (the CA) is a person!

For the Election Commission (EC) to pretend that it is close to registering all eligible voters is rubbish. The last decent census "on the ground" took place when? Do we know how many Nepalis there are; where they live or are currently at work (home, in India or abroad); what is their ethnic or other group composition by which they articulate primary concerns; or what is their distribution by districts; or geographic areas (mountains, hills, inner and outer terai); or economic "regions" such as the "Karnali" area in the far west? This kind of detail may not be crucial in parliamentary elections that take place every few years, but essential for constituent assembly elections that take place once in a lifetime!

Most neutral observers would agree that the elections must be "inclusive" if they are to be legitimate. In the current situation of acute ethnic, regional, and other sectarian awareness cum discontent, it is vital that the past experience of elections be avoided, when it was the norm for a party to dominate government on the basis of having won some 60 per cent of seats in parliament with only 40 percent or so of the popular vote, which was itself often based on a turnout of only 50 per cent or so of total eligible voters. Thus large numbers of the "sovereign" people were not adequately represented in government or parliament, and far too many were not represented at all! This may be worse in case of representation by gender, ethnicity, caste, and so on. It will take a lot of thinking to develop a much more representative system of elections. The EC seems to admit that, only months away from the June 2007 CA elections, it still has not been given a clear and credible system to work with. The "mumbo-jumbo" version that the ruling SPAM combine is still discussing, for promulgation through the "interim" assembly, is unclear even to the urban "literates"!

Those who see democracy as "government of the people, by the people, for the people" have reason to be alarmed by the Bill on Political Parties, 2063 that was tabled at the "interim legislature" that joins "ghost" legislators of the House of Representatives elected in 1999 and dissolved by the then Nepali Congress Prime Minister Deuba in 2002, with unelected Maoist insurgents (the US has still not lifted the terrorist tag on the Maoists).

The Bill makes it impossible to register "new" political parties without ten thousand signatures. This is at a time when the Maoists, sometimes with Seven Party bedfellows, have regularly and routinely used force and threat and blackmail to prevent opposition rallies of even a few hundred people, and have said that their "loktantra" or "people's democracy" is not for "royalists" and the like, and have labeled Madhesi protestors as "bandits". If the constituent assembly elections are to be "inclusive" and credible, then it must be possible for all citizens, who think they have something to say, to canvass for the people's vote, as individuals or groups, independent of "established" parties; recent events have shown that the latter may not be able to reflect and to articulate the variety of ethnic, regional, sectarian, gender, or whatever interests that have boiled over since April 2006.

The proposal to forbid donations or grants from international organizations and foreign governments is a bemusing "holier than thou" gesture from SPAM, which would have been nothing and nowhere without such massive direct and indirect inputs. The proposal to ban donations from national organizations and individuals is mad and ludicrous. What is a party if it is not a free initiative of individuals and groups willing to put their money where their mind and their mouth are! Can a Nepali not fund a party that he has founded, or that he is a member of, or for which he canvasses and votes for in elections? Crazy!

So parties must now depend on government grants for money? It looks Stalinist! Who controls government? It is the same Seven Party Alliance and Maoists, who are making it impossible to form parties through impossible preconditions backed by intimidation!

The parties have not even begun to campaign for the June elections, but signs are already ominous. Advocates of constitutional monarchy and "royalists" have routinely had their meetings broken up by Maoists (especially the Young Communist League), often in conjunction with Seven Party elements, at places varied as Phidim, Birtamod, Rajbiraj, Lamjung, Pokhara, and Kathmandu, for some time now ("Royalist meet disrupted", 17 March 2007, Kathmandu Post). Participants, often old, have been beaten up, garlanded with shoes, paraded through the streets, and so on. Individuals are not immune from what the Economist has called Maoist "thuggery" (10 March 2007), as in the recent beating of a leading hotelier, for supporting "constitutional monarchy" or not paying "donations".

This has had a very chilling effect on the freedoms of opinion, expression, assembly, and association, which are necessary for free and fair elections. This is taking place under the benign silence of Home Minister Situala, and eerie quiet of the Election Commission.

If UN Special Representative Ian Martin and his United Nations Mission in Nepal have done anything remotely convincing in facilitating a free and fair atmosphere for the polls, then this is a well kept secret. Under his benign "monitoring" the Maoist were allowed to grow to a "registered" 34,000 combatants, from a probable strength of 9,000. He allowed the Maoists to look convincing in registering only 3,400 sundry weapons, against 34,000 claimed combatants! He is silent about the overall situation of threat, beating, extortion, disruption and silencing of opposition that is chilling to holding of free and fair elections.

Ian Martin, the Secretary General's Special Representative, and head of the UN Mission in Nepal (UNMIN), has failed in fundamental aspects of his mission. Otherwise UNMIN would have long ago stated publicly, what the basic parameters are for CA elections to be open, free and fair; it would have monitored if and to what extent these parameters were being met; it would have stated whether and when the country was ready to have credible elections; and it would make clear that the UN would not certify as credible any elections that do not meet basic requirements. Farcical elections will turn UNMIN into FUNMIN!

In its present RAW format and rushed time, the constituent assembly elections constitute "political engineering" to produce pre-ordained results. This intention was apparent when Prime Minister Girija Koirala denied to the "sovereign" people the option of referendum on the monarchy, because he knew that monarchy, and the Hindu "rastra" or state, would be vindicated! To SPAM "democracy" is "government of the parties, by the parties, for the parties" or "democratic centralism". Abraham Lincoln said it was "government of the people, by the people, for the people." Ke garne!

[Chintit Nepali]

    The global community is getting great opportunity to watch the very interesting fun making game in free of cost which have veen very gloriously exhibiting in Nepal under the dynamic and able direction leading by current state running leadrds which in order words the mockery to democracy and rule of law can be learned from the model democracy that Nepal are adopting after ten years-long war in which more than thirteen thousands innocents sons and daughter lost their precious lives.
   By adopting anti-democratic policy and bypassing the democratic rights of the people,Nepal is heading towards the model democracy and profounders of the same are now asking the global community to accept the same as ideal and most real democracy tha has ever been practiced by world.So,if any country in the globe would ever like to have make a new country like new Nepal can proudly follow the path shown by Nepali leaders in inventing model democracy.Jay Nepal !

[PatriotNepali]

This so called   INTERIM CONSTITUTION is the      PLOY BOOK of   SPA-M Thugs and Terrorists.    This is the RULE Book of   UNRULY    THUGS.

SO what can we Expect?    FROM     THESE THUGS AND    TERRORISTS of our KINGDOM.


PN
Glory of Crown Shine For centuries TO COME. Long Live our King and QUEEN.

[Bishnu]

This so called   INTERIM CONSTITUTION is the      PLOY BOOK of   SPA-M Thugs and Terrorists.    This is the RULE Book of   UNRULY    THUGS. SO what can we Expect?    FROM     THESE THUGS AND    TERRORISTS of our KINGDOM.

Clear message to hardtalk and PatriotNepal!
Contents of your posting, irrespective of title is same, Terrorist, thungs, mother fucker, i will kill all  etc. only insults.
I think it damage the image of monarchy you are supporting. General people have then clear image who is supporting monarchy. You are helping in this way not the monarch but SPAs and maoists.
Regarding amendment of IC, I think it is helpful also to king to fallow law and order. he will be bound under rule. A big mistake of Panchayat war no limit of power for king. no limit of power may lead to a person to misuse of power.
Nothing can happen to king if he does not like to distrub the CA-Election.

I would suggest to king to establish his own party and go for election. I hope he will get enough votes. but there is no chance to get support from a party, because they are supporters of person not an ideology. King has real chance to be next president through his own party.

[Dr Prithvi]

Bishnu
I posted this below to another of your postings but dont seem to have had a reply.Some of us ARE supportive of an ideology (constitutional monarchy) rather than a person, as I have consistently maintained on this discussion board.

Dear Bishnu
it seems that you are of a similar political persuasion to raj66, so I thought I'd ask you to try and help me with the same questions I put to him:

Quote
Raj66, I have been reading your posts of the last few days with some interest. It seems that you are a very experienced poster (over 1000 posts) and a non-monarchy sympathiser. I am personally glad to see you on this discussion board as someone I may be able to get some answers from (most of the others seem to have vanished or won't/can't answer). Could you try these for me:
1. Why is the party led by Prachanda called Maoist?
2. Can you give/name me 5 good things done by Mao Tse Tung whose doctrine this party follow?
3. Why do maoists in general fear religion and the press?
4. If Nepal becomes a federal republic how will this help my friends in the Humla region?
5.Why do Prachanda and Baburam not hold ministerial posts in the government?
6. Is the role of the elections in June to elect representatives, to elect/choose a party, to decide on a republic or a monarchy?
7. Does Hisila giving up the right to private property/assets include her husband Dr Bhattrai too?
I hope you can enlighten me on some answers to these questions which I am really trying to understand. Of course these are the things one asks in a democracy.
If the answers are too long to write here then please do it via a personal message.
I look forward to hearing from you
Likewise if you want to communicate your answers personally that would be fine. I havent heard back from raj66 yet but if you are in touch with him please tell him I am eagerly awaiting his reply.

[hardtalk]

Clear message to hardtalk and PatriotNepal!
Contents of your posting, irrespective of title is same, Terrorist, thungs, mother fucker, i will kill all  etc. only insults.

LOL, some of the words you used come from your own mouth and we don't use them. You are a terrorist, thug! Once a terrorist, always a terrorist. You are a liar, a propagandist who can't even stand on his own words. You come here with different nicknames to insult people and establish your propaganda but it's not working here and you are losing. Why are you giving me us a Clear Message? Because your Young Communist League can't kill us? See what they are doingn:

YCL cadres thrash businessman in Biratnagar

A leading businessman has been thrashed by cadres of Young Communist League (YCL) and pro-Maoist union activists in Biratnagar on Tuesday.

Shyam Sundar Sharda of Sharda Group of Industries was physically thrashed, garlanded with shoes and paraded around the city by the Maoist activists who accused him of framing an abduction of one of their members. He was later hospitalised.

Sharda has been accused of seeking help of Indian criminals to abduct his driver Raj Kumar Rajdhami who happens to be a member of pro-Maoist workers union.

Following the incident, business community in Biratnagar have shut down their activities accusing the administration and police of remaining mute spectator when Sharda was being paraded around the city.

In another incident, Kantipur TV reported that a foreign employment entrepreneur Sher Bahadur Raut has been abducted by YCL in Kathmandu.

Raut has been missing since last three days, according to his wife Kalpana Raut. She said that the Maoists have conceded that her husband is under their control. The Maoists claimed they were investigating case of cheating, she said. nepalnews.com sd Apr 10 07

[/color]


So what do you have to say? You terrorist. Justify the above actions and the millions of other threads here. Why don't you come down to justify the actions? Terrorist! You can't kill us on the internet and you don't have any single words to justify the actions of your terrorist brothers who have killed us and destroyed us and gunned us down:

School employee shot at in Thamel

An unidentified group shot and injured an employee of a school in Thamel of Kathmandu Wednesday morning.

According to reports, a group of people in motorcycles shot Basanta Maharjan, an employee of Lokhit secondary school at around 8.30 am. He was shot while on the way to the school, reports said.

Maharjan is undergoing treatment at Manmohan Memorial Hospital in Sorakhutte. nepalnews.com pb Apr 11 07

Bloody idiot terrorist, you are a killer. You are fed by terrorists to raise your propaganda here too. But guess what, no matter how hard you try...you can't justify your plan. You don't want elections...you never hear what people have to say...You think it is your Monopoly and you can do anything? You didn't even care to justify the killings and criminal activities run by you.

You keep saying that you are leaving the forum because we Brand you as terrorist...why don't you just leave us alone and get the f*ck out of here and Nepal. We Nepalis have had enough of your terrorism. You bull shitter get the f*ck out of here. A bloody terrorist, killer, rapist and murderer of Nepalis. Get out!

[hardtalk]

And terrorists Bishnu and Raj...we are not alone here...there are 15 people in this forum who hate you terrorists...and by the way Americans also hate your terrorist warlord Pushpa Dahal...Seems like your SPAM warlords have really pissed off the Americans...See what the Americans said to Pushpa..See yourself:

Prachanda claim inaccurate, malicious: US Embassy

Kathmandu, 11 April: Acting US Embassy Public Affairs Officer Sharon Hudson-Dean said Wednesday Maoist leader Prachanda’s claim US government doesn’t want scheduled 20 June election is malicious and inaccurate."The United States believes that these elections are critical for Nepal’s peace process. Prachanda’s comments are yet another example of of Maoist disinformation."As a partner in the Interim Government, they also should publicly demonstrate credibility and an adherence to the facts," she said in a letter published in The Kathmandu Post. People’s News/BR

Keep away from here as we are educated people who have THINKING power. You can't kill us here. Your propaganda can't be sold to us. Now come up with another nick to abuse us and throw another propaganda at us. Everyone knows that you are your terrorist father Pushpa Dahal is a killer!!!!!! They don't believe in Elections!!!!!

[Bishnu]

Keep away from here as we are educated people who have THINKING power. You can't kill us here. Your propaganda can't be sold to us. Now come up with another nick to abuse us and throw another propaganda at us. Everyone knows that you are your terrorist father Pushpa Dahal is a killer!!!!!! They don't believe in Elections!!!!!

I have never written a single word to support prachanda, GPK and MAKUNE etc.  I have written only one ideology, only elected leaders have right to rule the country. I think, Raj is also not a blind supporter of SPA and maoists.
how you can say, you are an educated who says all who accept  an ideology, accepted by whole world is a terrorist ?
Pls. mention me  threads where I have written a single word to support prachanda!
I think you are not educated but you learned english very well and have no common sense.
you have still not answered my question? why kingship is better than democracy ?
(I know your answer, you terrorist, thugs, I am going to kill you, etc, etc.)
if king is a good person with clear vision, why he can not be elected leader ?
This is wrong opinion, I(=king ) am king, accept all, This should be accepted by folk.
 

[Dr Prithvi]

Bishnu
Are you going to help me with answers to my questions?

[Bishnu]

Bishnu
Are you going to help me with answers to my questions?

Dear Dr. prithvi!
I have answered you question which were directed to raj66. but i could not remember the threads.

I will try it again (Inline).
1. Why is the party led by Prachanda called Maoist?
This is called only maoists. Their agenda shows that that have to change their name to socielist party or some thing else. The ideology of mao may be not bad in his time now it is outdated. nobody in this world can impliment maoism now.Perhaps they have started war as like mao therefore
2. Can you give/name me 5 good things done by Mao Tse Tung whose doctrine this party follow?
free school, free health service, work for all, modernization of china etc. There was almost no democratic right at that time. Therefore new change was necessary in china
3. Why do maoists in general fear religion and the press?
I do not think that maoist are against press freedom. But religion is misused always to legitimize oppression by men, feudals, monarch etc. king as reincarnation of god, woman has to fallow all the commands of man otherwise god will punish them, lower and higher caste etc.

4. If Nepal becomes a federal republic how will this help my friends in the Humla region?
free school, free health service, raod way to humla etc.
5.Why do Prachanda and Baburam not hold ministerial posts in the government?
they do not like to work under GPK, if would join it, if they get the post of PM, president etc. They can not show their performance (if any) under GPK
6. Is the role of the elections in June to elect representatives, to elect/choose a party, to decide on a republic or a monarchy?
it is elction of CA to write new constitution, Types of consititution depends on kingdom or republic therefore monarch is the main point
7. Does Hisila giving up the right to private property/assets include her husband Dr Bhattrai too?
She should do it. do not worry about it! I have met many maoist cadres and I have watched the film (PRATYAKRAM).
The cadres will never forgive them if they misuse national income (corruption etc. etc.) Still there is active mass of maoist cadres, nothing wrong would happened with maoist ministers. I am not sure, afterward.

? 

[hardtalk]

Dr Prithvi,

These terrorists will skip tough question. They will not answer why they have killed Nepalis and why are they continue to do so. For 10 years now they have run with guns and propaganda. The only way to deal with these terrorists is to shoot them or else they will continue to kill us day in and day out. It's all their propaganda...elections and everything are propaganda...didn't you see how they take citizenship of Nepal illegally? They will not answer all those questions...these are all illegal bastards and terrorists and we should not indulge in conversation with them...just shoot them.

And You terrorists,

 Elections and craps, do you think we believe you bastard terrorists. No, we don't. You do not believe in Democracy...you believe in Terroristocracy. If you believe in Democracy than you have no right to rule Nepal right now because we haven't voted you to power...just resign you illegal terrorists!